🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.